Search the leading directory for the private wealth industry

Manage your profile

Let 38,000 visitors find you. With 172,000 page views, Citywealth enables UHNW clients and charities to review your services quickly.

Upgrade profile options

There is currently no image available

To add an image please upgrade now

Sandra Davis

Partner, Head of Family

Specialism: Lawyers Family and Matrimonial

Company: Mishcon de Reya

Location: London, England

Citywealth rating

3
Average: 3 (2 votes)
Fee Level:
3
Average: 3 (2 votes)
Quality of Advice
3
Average: 3 (2 votes)
Communications Skills
3
Average: 3 (2 votes)
Interpersonal Skills
3
Average: 3 (2 votes)
X

Please make sure you fill in all the fields marked with an asterisk *

Peer review:

Sandra is exceptional. She is the lawyer you want on your side. She has a wealth of experience and has a superb judgment. She is dedicated, empathetic and is head and shoulders above her peers.

07 Feb 2018

Start Ratings
Written Review
Your Details
If ticked your name and company will not be shown under your review of this person. However, entering your details is essential, as we will not publish any review we cannot verify. Please note you are not allowed to rate or review individuals who work for the same company as yourself.

Your personal data is used for internal purposes only and is never sold or shared. For any enquiries, please email assistant editor April French at afrench@citywealthmag.com

next >
< back

Sandra Davis currently has no profile.

To add a profile please upgrade now

2018  Powerwomen Awards

Champion of the Year - Mentoring/Sponsoring Programme | Gold Winner

Sandra Davis currently has no Citywealth award

Average client size: Over £25 million

Fixed fee offering: No

Mishcon de Reya

Number of offices globally: 1-5

Sandra Davis currently has no contact details

Peer review:

Sandra is exceptional. She is the lawyer you want on your side. She has a wealth of experience and has a superb judgment. She is dedicated, empathetic and is head and shoulders above her peers.

07 Feb 2018

Start Ratings
Written Review
Your Details
If ticked your name and company will not be shown under your review of this person. However, entering your details is essential, as we will not publish any review we cannot verify. Please note you are not allowed to rate or review individuals who work for the same company as yourself.

Your personal data is used for internal purposes only and is never sold or shared. For any enquiries, please email assistant editor April French at afrench@citywealthmag.com

Sandra Davis currently has no reviews

Saudi businessman's ex-wife awarded £56m, plus assets worth £20m

Sandra acted for the prominent Saudi businessman whose wife issued an application under the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act for a financial remedy in the British Courts, following an overseas divorce. At the final hearing in June 2016, the wife's claim was limited to needs and she was awarded £56 million, plus assets in her own name worth £20 million. The high profile case attracted significant media coverage.

Africa's "youngest billionaire" ordered to pay ex-wife after trying to hide money offshore

Sandra is acting on a widely-reported case Thakkar v Thakkar for the wife of Africa's so-called youngest billionaire and the founder of a group of companies with a turnover reported to be in excess of $1billion.

Yet, in the divorce, the husband disclosed assets worth only £450k, and claimed that the group was legally and beneficially owned by the key members of his family. Sandra joined the husband's key members of the family to the proceedings, and obtained disclosure orders against the husband, his family, the trust in the BVI and other third parties, with a view to establishing who beneficially owned the group.

Following a five day preliminary issue hearing, the judge found that the key members of the husband's family were holding legal ownership of the group as the husband's nominees, with the husband being the sole beneficial owner of the group. The husband was refused permission to appeal and will have to pay the wife's costs on the indemnity basis.